Legal Opinion

Bartley v. Karas

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1983No. Civ. 53503PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BARRY-DEAL, J.

In this action to quiet title to real property, respondents Rex M. Bartley and John Beale, purchasers at a foreclosure sale, sought to terminate the equitable interest of appellants Jack J. Karas and Frank V. Tharp, vendees under an installment sale contract. Appellants challenge the judgment in respondents’ favor after a nonjury trial on the ground that the trial court erred by terminating their rights as defaulting vendees without affording them an opportunity to cure their default and reinstate the contract. We reverse.

Facts

Under the instalment contract, executed July…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. CQL Original Products, Inc. v. National Hockey League Players' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Greshko v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Petersen v. HartellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Brock v. First South Savings Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Petersen v. HartellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API