Legal Opinion
Aubry v. Goldhor
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1988No. B028780PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained defendants’ demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend 1 on the ground plaintiff’s action is barred by the statute of limitations.
Facts
Plaintiff, Labor Commissioner of the State of California, sued the former employers of one Craig Allen to recover overtime wages due Allen and a statutory penalty for failure to pay such wages on termination of Allen’s employment. The complaint, filed February 9, 1987, contained two causes of action. The first cause of action alleged: At all times…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Collier v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Campbell v. Graham-ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Community Cause v. BoatwrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Hernandez v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Martinez v. Master Protection Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Cuadra v. MillanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Baker v. AubryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Medrano v. D'Arrigo Bros. Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.