Sunpreme Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion dissenting-in-part filed by Chief Judge Prost.
Clevenger, Circuit Judge.
Sunpreme Inc. appeals from the final decision of the United States Court of International Trade in favor of the United States and SolarWorld Americas, Inc., concluding that Sunpreme's solar modules are covered by the scope of antidumping and countervailing duty orders on U.S. imports of certain solar cells from the People's Republic of China. The United States and SolarWorld cross-appeal from the same decision, which also concluded that Commerce could not instruct United States Customs and Border Protection to…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Sandvik Steel Company v. United States, Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Quiedan Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Perfectus Aluminum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- TR Int'l Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Joseph Nussbaumer, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Dept of Children and FamiliesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.