Legal Opinion

TR Int'l Trading Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 16, 2020No. 19-00022PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Slip Op. 20- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE TR INTERNATIONAL TRADING COMPANY, Plaintiff, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Judge v. Court No. 19-00022 UNITED STATES, ET AL., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER [Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is granted. The partial consent motion to intervene as Defendant-Intervenors is denied as moot.] Dated: March 16, 2020 John M. Peterson, Neville Peterson LLP, of New York, NY, argued for Plaintiff. With him on the brief were Lawrence J. Bogard and Michael K. Tomenga. Justin R. Miller, Attorney-in-Charge, International…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tr International Trading v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
  2. Avkare, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API