Legal Opinion
Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 29, 1994No. 94-1292PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The United States Customs Service (Customs) denied Mitsubishi’s protest of an anti-dumping duty rate. The United States Court of International Trade dismissed Mitsubishi’s appeal. Mitsubishi Elecs. Am., Inc. v. United States, 848 F.Supp. 193, 203 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1994). Mitsubishi appeals the dismissal. Because Mitsubishi sued the Government under the wrong jurisdictional statute and the limitations period had expired under the proper statute, this court affirms.
BACKGROUND
Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. (MELA) imports 64K Dynamic Random Access Memory components (64K…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Royal Business MacHines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1980
- Royal Business Machines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Sandvik Steel Company v. United States, Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Fujitsu General America, Inc. (Successor-In-Interest to Teknika Electronics Corp.) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- United States Shoe Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Ugine and Alz Belgium v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Sunpreme Inc. v. United States, Solarworld Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.