Legal Opinion
Quiedan Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 2, 2019No. 2018-1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taranto, Circuit Judge.
Quiedan Company is an importer of agricultural stakes produced in the People's Republic of China. It imports the stakes for use in training grape vines and other plants. Each stake is made of steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) by cutting rebar to a length of four to five feet followed by sharpening one end to a point to ease driving the stake into the ground. The United States Department of Commerce concluded that Quiedan's stakes are clearly within the scope of an antidumping duty order covering rebar from China. We see no substantive or procedural error in that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nan Ya Plastics Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- King Supply Co., LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Dupont Teijin Films Usa, Lp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Ams Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Omg, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- TMB 440AE, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.