Legal Opinion

Mathie v. Mathie

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1961No. 9345PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

The plaintiff, who was granted a decree •of divorce, appeals attacking only the disposition of property made therein.

It is apparent that the trial court, 'being convinced that the parties had come to a necessary parting of the ways, and that .grounds for divorce were established, proceeded to consider the various factors proper to take into account1 and in the light ■thereof made such adjustment of their property rights as he thought would provide the best foundation for each to live separately. Having done so, it is our duty to give deference to his advantaged position and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Callister v. CallisterUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Cronin v. HebditchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  4. Wiegand v. WiegandIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Lawlor v. LawlorUtah Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reese v. ReeseUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hoyt v. HoytTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Pearson v. PearsonUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Clark v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  5. Ansin v. Craven-AnsinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API