Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Wilson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1956No. 8434PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.. From a decree awarding the plaintiff a divorce, the defendant appeals. He does not attack the part of the decree granting the divorce; on the contrary, it seems to suit his designs very well. He asked plaintiff to secure a divorce for the reason that he was in love with a certain Mrs. M. and wanted to marry her. Notwithstanding the fact that the divorce was indispensable to his plans, he seems to have desired, not unnaturally, to be released from the bonds of matrimony at the least possible economic disadvantage to himself.

Having found the issues in favor of the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. MacDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Pinion v. PinionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hendricks v. HendricksUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Foreman v. ForemanUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Lawlor v. LawlorUtah Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Wiese v. WieseUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Cox v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Englert v. EnglertUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Read v. ReadUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Searle v. SearleUtah Supreme Court · 1974

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API