Legal Opinion

Callister v. Callister

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1953No. 7967PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOYT, District Judge.

This appeal involves first the question of power of the-court to modify provisions of a divorce decree which required defendant (respondent here) to malee monthly payments to plaintiff throughout her life or until her remarriage. In 1945 plaintiff (appellant) commenced suit for divorce and prayed for division of property and for alimony. During the pendency of the proceedings an “Agreement of Property Settlement and Alimony” was entered into and executed by the parties. In addition to provisions for division between the parties of real and personal property of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North v. NorthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Dickey v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  5. Sears Ettlinger v. EttlingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Farley v. FarleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Reese v. ReeseUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Land v. LandUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Erickson v. BeardallUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Klein v. KleinUtah Supreme Court · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API