Legal Opinion
Reese v. Reese
Utah Supreme Court
Decided August 20, 1999No. 980004PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSON, Justice:
¶ 1 This petition arises out of the divorce decree of Sheila and Thomas Reese. The trial court apportioned property, ordered Thomas to pay child support, and denied Sheila’s request for alimony. Sheila appealed. The court of appeals directly treated only three of the many issues presented. It affirmed the trial court’s decree with respect to Sheila’s imputed income, ordered modifications of the decree to apportion day-care expenses equally, and postponed the date on which Sheila would be obligated to satisfy a lien in Thomas’ favor. See Reese v. Reese, No. 960749-CA (Utah…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Management Services Corp. v. Development AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Callister v. CallisterUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- Carrier v. Pro-Tech RestorationUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- Willey v. WilleyUtah Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. FinlaysonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Ashby v. AshbyUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- Peirce v. PeirceUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Robinson v. Tripco Investment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.