Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Pearson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1977No. 14626PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

This is an appeal from an order in a decree of divorce dividing property pursuant to a general formula stipulated to by the parties. The formula was not followed in specific detail but the court, after more than one lengthy hearing, made a specific division of all real and personal property. The appellant was dissatisfied with the division and filed this appeal asserting the trial court failed to make appropriate findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment in accord with the said stipulation of the parties, however, makes no claim that the ultimate judgment was not just…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Callister v. CallisterUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Jankele v. Texas Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Stone v. StoneUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Klein v. KleinUtah Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sampson v. RichinsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Jones v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Fletcher v. FletcherUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Farmers State Bank v. Mobile Homes UnlimitedMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wheeler v. Carlson TransportMontana Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API