Ansin v. Craven-Ansin
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.
We granted direct appellate review in this divorce proceeding to determine whether so-called “postnup-tial” or “marital” agreements are contrary to public policy and, *284if not, whether the marital agreement at issue is enforceable.1 The dispute is between Kenneth S. Ansin (husband) and Cheryl A. Craven-Ansin (wife) concerning the validity of their 2004 written agreement “settling all rights and obligations arising from their marital relationship” in the event of a divorce. Two years after the agreement was executed, in November, 2006, the husband filed a complaint for divorce and sought to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Knox v. RemickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Casto v. CastoSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Bratton v. BrattonTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- Dominick v. DominickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Osborne v. OsborneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bedrick v. BedrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Breda v. McDonaldDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- In re the Marriage of TrasterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
- In re Estate of WilberSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Balogh v. BaloghHawaii Supreme Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.