Legal Opinion
Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 8, 2002No. C1-01-2127PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Relator Billy Graham Evangelistic Association owns several properties in the Harmon Place area of Minneapolis. The Minneapolis Heritage Preservation Commission recommended, and the Minneapolis City Council approved, a historic district that includes a number of realtor’s properties. By writ of certiorari, relator challenges the city’s designation. Because we conclude the city’s designation of the Harmon Place Historic District was arbitrary and capricious, we reverse.
FACTS
In November 2001, the Heritage Preservation Commission (commission) of the City of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- White Bear Docking & Storage, Inc. v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- CEMETERY v. City of RosevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Heidtke v. Zimmerman SeedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002