Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentGilbert, Justice
I concur that a historical district can include some noncontributing properties and that the standard of review is arbitrary and capricious. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the City did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in this case and would affirm the court of appeals.
This designation procedure hinges on a report (Zellie Report) prepared by the City’s commissioned consultant, Carole *129Zellie (consultant). This consultant studied a section on the southern edge of downtown Minneapolis, where the City’s automotive industry flourished from around the turn of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Historic Green Springs, Inc. v. BerglandDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1980
- Amcon Corp. v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.