Legal Opinion · Dissent

Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 14, 2003No. C1-01-2127Published

1DissentGilbert, Justice

I concur that a historical district can include some noncontributing properties and that the standard of review is arbitrary and capricious. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the City did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in this case and would affirm the court of appeals.

This designation procedure hinges on a report (Zellie Report) prepared by the City’s commissioned consultant, Carole *129Zellie (consultant). This consultant studied a section on the southern edge of downtown Minneapolis, where the City’s automotive industry flourished from around the turn of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Historic Green Springs, Inc. v. BerglandDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1980
  5. Amcon Corp. v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API