Commonwealth v. O'Berg
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CAPPY.
In Commonwealth v. Grant, 572 Pa. 48, 813 A.2d 726, 738 (2002), this court held, as a general rule, that claims of ineffective assistance of counsel should be deferred until the collateral review proceedings. In this case, the Superior Court applied Grant and dismissed Appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Presently, we are asked to consider whether this court should recognize a “short sentence” exception to the general rule announced in Grant. For the reasons stated herein, we agree with the disposition of the Superior Court and reject a “short…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. DouglasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. McMullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. ColavitaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. ListonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. FowlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.