Commonwealth v. Holmes
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASTILLE, Chief Justice.
In this appeal, we consider the reviewa-bility of claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on post-verdict motions and direct appeal under Commonwealth v. Bomar, 573 Pa. 426, 826 A.2d 831 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1115, 124 S.Ct. 1053, 157 L.Ed.2d 906 (2004), and Commonwealth v. Grant, 572 Pa. 48, 813 A.2d 726 (2002), including the question of whether ineffectiveness claims may be" considered if accompanied by a waiver of review as of right under the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9541 et seq. (“PCRA”). For the reasons that follow, we vacate…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Trevino v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by546 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FearsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. HenkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. ButerbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. Robinson, A., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
541 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.