Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 2013PublishedCited by 546 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CASTILLE, Chief Justice.

In this appeal, we consider the reviewa-bility of claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on post-verdict motions and direct appeal under Commonwealth v. Bomar, 573 Pa. 426, 826 A.2d 831 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1115, 124 S.Ct. 1053, 157 L.Ed.2d 906 (2004), and Commonwealth v. Grant, 572 Pa. 48, 813 A.2d 726 (2002), including the question of whether ineffectiveness claims may be" considered if accompanied by a waiver of review as of right under the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9541 et seq. (“PCRA”). For the reasons that follow, we vacate…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Trevino v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by546 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FearsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. HenkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. ButerbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. Robinson, A., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

541 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API