Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Grant
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 31, 2002No. 57 WAP 2001PublishedCited by 1,060 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice CAPPY.
This court granted the instant appeal to consider whether the Superior Court erred in failing to remand Appellant’s claims related to prosecutorial misconduct and trial counsel ineffectiveness for an evidentiary hearing to the trial court. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the order of the Superior Court.
The facts surrounding the case are as follows. The victim, Keith Gilliam, and his wife were leaving the Where’s It At Bar when gunshots were heard. The victim was killed. Shortly thereafter, a maroon car drove by and a second round of shots *53rang out, wounding two…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,060 opinions
- Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. FearsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
1,055 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.