Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Liston

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 17, 2009No. 57 WAP 2008PublishedCited by 151 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GREENSPAN.

The Commonwealth appeals from the Superior Court’s order remanding the matter to the trial court so that Appellee Clayton Leroy Liston may file a post-sentence motion nunc pro tunc. We hold that the Superior Court erred in declaring that a defendant who has been granted the right to file a notice of appeal nunc pro tunc shall also automatically be granted the right to file post-sentence motions nunc pro tunc. We further hold that the Superior Court’s order impermissibly created a new exception to our decision in Commonwealth v. Grant, 572 Pa. 48, 813 A.2d 726 (2002).…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. RegaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by151 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. HenkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. JetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API