Commonwealth v. Liston
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice GREENSPAN.
The Commonwealth appeals from the Superior Court’s order remanding the matter to the trial court so that Appellee Clayton Leroy Liston may file a post-sentence motion nunc pro tunc. We hold that the Superior Court erred in declaring that a defendant who has been granted the right to file a notice of appeal nunc pro tunc shall also automatically be granted the right to file post-sentence motions nunc pro tunc. We further hold that the Superior Court’s order impermissibly created a new exception to our decision in Commonwealth v. Grant, 572 Pa. 48, 813 A.2d 726 (2002).…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. RegaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by151 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. HenkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. JetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.