Roman v. City of Stamford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
In this negligence case, the dispositive issue is whether a municipality creates an actionable private duty by adopting a municipal charter in which it undertakes to provide for the care of public trees. The plaintiffs, Joann Roman and Madeline Roman, sued the defendant, the city of Stamford, for injuries that they suffered when their automobile was struck by a rotten tree located within the limits of a municipal roadway. The case was tried to a jury on the theory that the defendant could be found liable for negligence by *397virtue of a provision contained in the Stamford city charter that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Leger v. KelleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Dyer v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Roman v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Shortt v. New Milford Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- DeConti v. McGloneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Northrup v. WitkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Santiago v. City of New BritainConnecticut Superior Court · 1991
- Elinsky v. Marlene, No. Cv96 0557659 (Oct. 31, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.