Roman v. City of Stamford
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The defendant city of Stamford appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered, after a jury trial, in favor of the named plaintiff, Joann Roman, in the amount of $25,000, and in favor of the plaintiff Madeline Roman, in the amount of $4690. The named plaintiff cross appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion to set aside the jury verdict as being inadequate. The issue dispositive of both the appeal and the cross appeal is whether a municipality is liable in negligence where an automobile is struck by a falling tree located within the limits of the roadway, because a city…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Sestito v. City of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Hoffman v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Lukas v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Roman v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- DeConti v. McGloneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Northrup v. WitkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Stevens v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Santiago v. City of New BritainConnecticut Superior Court · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.