Legal Opinion
Los Angeles Transfer Co. v. Ritz Carlton Hotel Co. of Hollywood, Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 24, 1935No. Civ. 10193PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, J., pro tem.
These cases were consolidated for the purposes of trial and upon conclusion thereof a single set of findings of fact, conclusions of law and a single judgment was entered, the judgment being against the Los Angeles Transfer Company in each case. Said company appeals from said judgment.
The general factual background of these cases is identical to that which is outlined in the ease of California Western Holding Co. v. R. D. Merrill et al. (referred to herein as the Lee case), (ante, p. 131 [46 Pac. (2d) 175]), decided this day by this court. The causes of action pleaded in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Teachout v. BogyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Castle v. Acme Ice Cream Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- First National Bank v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- California Western Holding Co. v. MerrillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ogier v. Pacific Oil & Gas Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- People v. OttermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Black Point Aggregates, Inc. v. Niles Sand & Gravel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Kendall v. MattisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966