Legal Opinion
Kendall v. Mattison
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 1, 1966No. Civ. No. 28157Published
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
These actions were consolidated for trial and both plaintiffs appeal in a consolidated appeal. Both actions were suits to collect on promissory notes made by defendant Mattison. The notes were given as partial payment for the escrowed sale of corporate stock owned by Kendall and Nathason. Baron has no interest in the note given to Kendall which was assigned to Baron for collection and reassigned to Kendall. Mattison filed a cross-complaint charging Kendall and Nathason with fraud in the transaction, and with violation of the Corporate Securities Law. The court found against him in the fraud…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Duntley v. KagariseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Ogier v. Pacific Oil & Gas Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Stonehocker v. CassanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Black Point Aggregates, Inc. v. Niles Sand & Gravel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Los Angeles Transfer Co. v. Ritz Carlton Hotel Co. of Hollywood, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1935