Legal Opinion

People v. Otterman

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 1957No. Crim. 5746PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Having been charged with five violations of the Corporate Securities Act (Corp. Code, § 26104, subd. (a)) and a like number of grand thefts arising out of the same transactions, defendant was convicted by a jury upon two counts of each class. The victims were Richard E. Truett (counts I and II of the information) and Edmund A. Wanner (counts VI and VII). Defendant was granted probation but appeals from that order (Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. 1) and from an order denying his motion for new trial (Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. 2). He also attempted to appeal from the sentence, which cannot be made the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. People v. FrankfortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. CitrinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. People v. ZavaletaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. State v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API