Legal Opinion

Lykins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1998No. 52 W.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

Appellant, Hubert Lykins, appeals an order of the Commonwealth Court affirming an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which reversed an order of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ). For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

On July 22, 1991, Appellant sustained a work-related injury to his neck and back while working for New Castle Foundry (Employer). Appellant received total disability benefits until returning to a light duty job in February of 1992, after which he then received partial disability benefits. On March 31, 1994, he again became…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hershey Chocolate Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Fells v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Lykins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. East v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Hrivnak v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Mosley v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Lawler v. Stefanyszyn, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1998
  5. Lykins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API