East v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice LAMB.
This appeal presents a question of first impression: whether the Minority Tolling Statute, 42 Pa.C.S. § 5533(b), 1 is applica ble to a claim for benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act 2 (Act). For the reasons that follow, we hold that it is not and reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court.
In November of 1983, Irvin East (Decedent) became disabled as a result of a work-related injury he sustained while employed by Appellant, USX Corporation 3 (Employer). In April of 1985, Decedent died as a result of his injury. Pursuant to an Agreement for Compensation for Death…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- United States v. DemkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johansen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Shick v. ShireySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Dolan v. Linton's LunchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cohen v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Reyes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Gallie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Gresik v. PA Partners, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- V.S. v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.