Legal Opinion

Hrivnak v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Mark Hrivnak (Claimant) petitions for review of a July 25, 2001 order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming the decision of workers’ compensation judge Francis J. DeSimone (WCJ DeSimone) to deny the Petition to Review Compensation Benefits (Review Petition) and the Petition for Assessment of Penalties (Penalty Petition) filed by Claimant. The question presented is whether R & L Development (Employer) is entitled to a credit under section 204(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act 1 (Act), as amended by Act 44 of 1993, 2 for the value of unemployment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Lykins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Cipcic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Lykins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Morgan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Merkel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Mosley v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Frye v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. D. Reber v. R.E. Shenker/Little Lexington Farms (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API