Legal Opinion

Hershey Chocolate Co. v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1996PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

Hershey Chocolate Company (Hershey) appeals from the order of the Commonwealth Court affirming the award of workers’ compensation benefits to Tania Lasher for a psychic injury claimed to have been caused by her employment as a district manager. The issue presented in this appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to prove that the psychic injury resulted from abnormal working conditions. We hold that the Commonwealth Court erred in finding that Lasher suffered psychic injury as a result of abnormal working conditions and reverse.

Lasher began her employment with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Volterano v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Berardelli v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Wilson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Davis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Payes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. City of Philadelphia v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. US Airways v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Young v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API