Legal Opinion

Lykins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1998No. 52 W.D. Appeal Docket 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

713 A.2d 77 (1998)

Hubert LYKINS, Appellant,

v.

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (NEW CASTLE FOUNDRY), Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 4, 1997.

Decided May 27, 1998.

Reargument Denied August 28, 1998.

Frank A. Natale, Dallas W. Hartman, New Castle, for Hubert Lykins.

Walter Werner, Paula S. Bischoff, Pittsburgh, for New Castle Foundry.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE and NIGRO, JJ.

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

Appellant, Hubert Lykins, appeals an order of the Commonwealth Court affirming an order of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which reversed an…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Page's Department Store v. VelardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Gibson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Bell v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Hershey Chocolate Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Fells v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API