State v. Neal
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McCRODDEN, Judge.
Defendants have each filed a brief in which the sole assignment of error is that the trial court erred in its denial of their motions to dismiss the charges of possession of cocaine with intent to sell and deliver cocaine. The question presented on appeal to this Court is whether there was sufficient evidence of constructive possession of cocaine for the court to send the case to the jury. We conclude that there was.
A trial court properly denies a motion to dismiss if there is substantial evidence that the offense was committed and that the defendant committed it. State v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. AcolatseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. RobledoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.