Legal Opinion

State v. Roseman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 10, 1971No. 24PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

The defendant’s Assignments of Error 5 and 6 are to the failure of the court to grant his motion for judgment of nonsuit. Upon such a motion, all admitted evidence favorable to the State, whether competent or incompetent, must be considered and must be deemed true. State v. Cutler, 271 N.C. 379, 156 S.E. 2d 679; State v. Stallings, 267 N.C. 405, 148 S.E. 2d 252; State v. Virgil, 263 N.C. 73, 138 S.E. 2d 777. The question for the court is whether there is substantial evidence to support a finding both that an offense charged in the bill of indictment has been committed and that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. KinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. NeiderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API