Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 11, 1983No. 454A82PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

A motion for directed verdict has the same legal effect as a motion for judgment of nonsuit and challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to go to the jury. State v. Glover, 270 N.C. 319, 154 S.E. 2d 305 (1967). The motion presents to the Court the question of whether there is substantial evidence of each essential element of the crime charged or a lesser included offense, and the question of whether defendant was the perpetrator of the crime. “Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” State v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. JerrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API