Legal Opinion

State v. Acolatse

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 2003No. COA02-824PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

Following his conviction on drug-related charges, defendant contends on appeal that the trial court erroneously failed to dismiss the charges against him. For the reasons given by our Supreme Court in State v. Chavis, 270 N.C. 306, 154 S.E.2d 340 (1967), we are compelled to hold that the record in this case shows that the evidence raised only a suspicion of possession; accordingly, we reverse defendant’s convictions.

The underlying facts of this case tend to show that while waiting on 29 August 2000 for a tax warrant to seize an unoccupied black Mercedes, Winston Salem Police…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. ChavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. NealCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. ShelmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API