Bormes v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May Be Granted. For the following reasons, the Motion is granted,
I. BACKGROUND
In his Class Action Complaint, Plaintiff James X. Bonnes (“Bormes”) alleges the following facts. In October 2000, Defendant United States of America (the “United States” or the “Government”), through the United States Department of the Treasury’s Financial Management Service, launched Pay.gov, an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. BormesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- James X. Bormes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Bormes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Tamara Barry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013