Legal Opinion
United States v. Bormes
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 13, 2012No. 11-192PublishedCited by 285 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
The Little Tucker Act, 28 U. S. C. § 1346(a)(2), provides that “[t]he district courts shall have original jurisdiction, concurrent with the United States Court of Federal Claims, of... [a]ny ... civil action or claim against the United States, not exceeding $10,000 in amount, founded . . . upon . . . any Act of Congress.” We consider whether the Little Tucker Act waives the sovereign immunity of the United States with respect to damages actions for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA or Act), 15 U. S. C. § 1681 et sea.
I—I
FCRA has as one of its purposes to “protect consumer…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by285 opinions
- BG Group, PLC v. Republic of ArgentinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Maine Community Health Options v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Horne v. Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Anthony Robinson v. US Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Herr v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
280 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.