Legal Opinion
James X. Bormes v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 22, 2014No. 13-1602PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
In an earlier stage of this litigation, the Supreme Court held that the Little Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), does not waive the sovereign immunity of the United States in a suit seeking to collect damages for an asserted violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1681x. United States v. Bormes, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 12, 184 L.Ed.2d 317 (2012). Although the case reached the Supreme Court from the Federal Circuit, the Supreme Court remanded it to us, because the suit originated in the Northern District of Illinois. (The original appeal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União Do VegetalSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Swain v. PressleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian CommunitySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jeremy Meyers v. Oneida Tribe of Indians of WiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Anthony Robinson v. US Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Stephanie Daniel v. National Park ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Reginald Kirtz v. Trans Union LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Klint L. Mowrer v. DOTCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.