Legal Opinion
Bormes v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 16, 2010No. 2009-1546PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Chief Judge.
James Bormes appeals the dismissal of his class action lawsuit under the Fan-Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681n(a). See Bormes v. United States, 638 F.Supp.2d 958 (N.D.Ill.2009). Because FCRA is a money-mandating statute that supports jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), this court vacates the dismissal and remands for further proceedings.
I
On August 9, 2008, Bormes, an attorney, filed a lawsuit on behalf of one of his clients in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois using its online document filing system. Bormes paid the filing…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. White Mountain Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. BormesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Richard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Spellissy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Tamara Barry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.