Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Furgason

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided January 26, 1979No. NCM 78 0302PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHEL, Judge:

His pleas to the contrary notwithstanding, appellant was convicted by special court-martial officer members of possession, transfer, introduction, sale, ahd use of marijuana in violation of Article 92, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 892, and communicating a threat *845and obstructing justice in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The sentence extended to the maximum jurisdictional limit of the trial forum.

On this appeal, appellant’s legal champion advances nine allegations of prejudicial error. Our consideration of one of these issues and our attendant conclusion effectively moot…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  2. United States v. TibbsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  3. United States v. CattUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. DunksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. DanielsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. PerryU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. McMurry v. United StatesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983
  3. United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. Alicea-BaezU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  5. United States v. PackerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API