State Ex Rel. Lacklineo v. Tahash
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
The district court denied petitioner’s pro se application for a writ of habeas corpus without a hearing and he appeals. He perfected his appeal and filed a brief, and thereafter, upon his application averring indigence, counsel was appointed to assist him and to represent him upon oral argument before this court.
The district court found that the allegations of the petition, when examined in the light of the record, did not establish any jurisdictional defects resulting in a denial of any substantial or constitutional rights guaranteed petitioner. In accordance with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- White v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Dinneen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Madison v. TahashDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1966
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Richard Edward Madison v. Ralph H. Tahash, Warden Minnesota State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Geiselhart v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.