Legal Opinion

LoRusso v. Hill

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 3, 1953PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the death of the plaintiff’s decedent. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained and, *556from the judgment thereafter rendered, the plaintiff has appealed.

The following facts, conceded for the purpose of testing the demurrer, will he an ample basis for a discussion of the legal question raised by the appeal. The plaintiff’s decedent was killed on August 21, 1951, by the overturning of his milk truck on a state highway which was under the defendant’s supervision. The sole proximate cause of his death was the defective condition of the highway. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rapid Motor Lines, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. Schaap v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Lorusso v. HillConnecticut Superior Court · 1951

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lussier v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Warkentin v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Town of Wethersfield v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  4. Everett v. IngrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  5. Sampiere v. ZaretskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API