Legal Opinion
Everett v. Ingraham
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 4, 1962PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
The Superior Court has reserved this case for our opinion under what is now General Statutes § 31-324. In a pro forma ruling, the workmen’s compensation commissioner for the second district determined that the plaintiff is not entitled to receive payment of an award of compensation from the second injury and compensation assurance fund, created by 1959 Public Act No. 580, § 12, because his injury antedated the effective date of the act, though the award of compensation for the injury was made after that date. The parties have stipulated the facts.
The plaintiff, on July 1, 1959, sustained an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Preveslin v. Derby & Ansonia Developing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Piccinim v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- LoRusso v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Seale v. BalsdonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Reid v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Chieppo v. Robert E. McMichael, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Coley v. Camden Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Balkus v. Terry Steam Turbine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Civardi v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.