Legal Opinion

Lorusso v. Hill

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided December 18, 1951No. File 19621PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

The plaintiff’s complaint seeks damages for the death of the plaintiff’s decedent, claimed to have been caused by a defective state highway which the defendant, as highway commissioner, was under a duty to keep in repair.

The complaint purports to state a cause of action under General Statutes, §2201, relating to state highways. In paragraph 8 the complaint alleges, in effect, that no statutory notice is being given because the action itself is being brought within the period (here sixty days) within which sudh notice is required.

The defendant demurs to the complaint for its failure to allege…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rapid Motor Lines, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. Forbes v. Town of SuffieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  3. Hoyle v. Town of PutnamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
  4. State v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LoRusso v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  2. Gauthier v. City of RockvilleConnecticut Superior Court · 1954
  3. LoRusso v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API