Legal Opinion

Bottum v. Herr

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1968No. File 10447, 10474PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOMEYER, Judge.

This appeal involves primarily a problem of nonjoinder of parties in an action to recover on a lost promissory note.

The complaint alleged that the defendant, Delane D. Herr, on or about March 1, 1964, executed and delivered to Roland E. Bauer, his promissory note for $7,500 due March 1, 1965, with interest at 8% per annum. That said note was lost by the payee on or about August 1, 1965, and was not endorsed when lost. That on or about March 1, 1965, $1,000 was paid on the principal and $600 in interest. That Bauer assigned the note to the plaintiff, Joseph H. Bottum III, on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. HosbrookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Harold L. Warner v. First National Bank of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
  3. Renner v. CrismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  4. J. F. Anderson Lumber Co. v. National Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Citizens' Bank v. CorkingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Buster v. GaleAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Boever v. South Dakota Board of AccountancySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Fullmer v. State Farm Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Knudson v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sorrels v. Queen of Peace HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API