Legal Opinion

Currey v. Currey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Marvin and Darlene Currey (Grandparents) sought a modification of visitation rights with their two grandchildren, the children of their son, Shawn Currey, and his ex-wife, Connie. Connie answered and countered to terminate the visitation rights of Grandparents. The trial court determined that (1) SDCL 25-4-52, which provides for grandparent visitation, was unconstitutional and (2) terminated Grandparents’ visitation rights. Grandparents appeal.. We reverse (1) and (2) and remand to determine whether grandparent visitation is in the best interests of the children.

FACTS

[¶…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Simpson v. TobinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kolb v. KolbSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Green v. Siegel, Barnett & SchutzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mayer v. MayerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dakotans for Health v. Kristi NoemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  2. Osgood v. OsgoodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Medearis v. WhitingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Feist Lemieux-Feist v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Kulbacki v. MichaelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API