Legal Opinion

State v. Shadbolt

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Rodney Shadbolt (Shadbolt) appeals his conviction for aggravated assault. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Shadbolt was self-employed as a private investigator. One of the services he performed as an investigator was to contract with bail bondsman in the Sioux Falls area to help locate and apprehend people who were out on bond and failed to appear in court. However, Shadbolt was not licensed as a bail bondsman or “runner” to perform such services.

[¶ 3.] On December 12, 1996, Jody Oppold secured a $300 bond from bail bondsman, Vince Davi. She subsequently failed to appear in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Kuper v. Lincoln-Union Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. West Two Rivers Ranch v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sundt Corp. v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Bergee v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. HaysSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. WellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Hohm v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API