Legal Opinion

A. Unruh Chiropractic Clinic v. De Smet Insurance Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 2010No. 25403PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In the course of providing treatment, Unruh Chiropractic Clinic (Unruh) obtained assignments of proceeds of personal injury claims from two patients. The patients’ claims arose out of injuries they sustained in an automobile accident involving a negligent driver insured by De Smet Insurance Company (De Smet). Although Unruh gave De Smet notice of the assignments, De Smet settled the claims on behalf of its insured without paying the proceeds to Unruh for its unpaid services. Unruh subsequently commenced this action against De Smet to recover under the assignments. On…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Dakotah Charter, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. First of Georgia InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Schnabel v. Taft Broadcasting Company, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Pauley v. SimonsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Hernandez v. Suburban Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Teresa Thompson v. William HarrieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  2. Atlantic Global Yield v. U.S. Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
  3. Ball v. Federal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2019
  4. Ball v. Federal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2019
  5. FALONI & ASSOCIATES, LLC v. CITIBANK, N.A.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API