Amarone v. Brennan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The essential facts as stipulated by the parties are as follows: The plaintiff sold beer on premises in New Haven under a tavern permit issued by the liquor control commission. He had carried on the business at the same site for four years under a permit, confining himself exclusively to the sale of Ballantine’s beer. On the exterior of the premises he displayed a sign advertising his business and the principal product sold within. This sign contained the name of the tavern and, in addition, the word “Ballantine’s” in the form of the trade-mark of the Ballantine Brewing Company. The sign had…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Springer v. Government of Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Skarzynski v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Loglisci v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Ingham v. BrooksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hannifan v. SachsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Cusano v. DunnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Commonwealth v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1943
- Griswold v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Griswold v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954