Legal Opinion

Skarzynski v. Liquor Control Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 4, 1937PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The plaintiff had been granted a tavern permit by the liquor control commission. In his application for that permit, in answer to a question, “Have you ever paid a fine or penalty for any prosecution against you for any violation of any federal or state law,” he stated that he had, twice, in October, 1917, and February, 1927, for “assault, liq.” He subsequently fitted up his place of business as a restaurant and applied to the commission for a restaurant permit. In this application he answered the question above quoted in the affirmative, stating the number of times as three, the offense as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Perdue v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. Moynihan's Appeal From County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  3. Wilks v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Gwiazda v. BerginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  5. Farrell's Appeal From County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  2. Conley v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  3. Grady v. KatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. Demond v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  5. Beaverdale Memorial Park, Inc. v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API