Legal Opinion

Ingham v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 5, 1920PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Action to recover damages, and also to obtain equitable relief, for the alleged wrongful removal of, and injury to, a fish-house and fishing paraphernalia owned by the plaintiffs within the Borough of Fenwick, brought to the Superior Court in Middlesex County where a demurrer to the second defense and to the defendants’ counterclaim was sustained (Burpee, J.) and the cause was afterward tried to the court, Reed, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendants upon…

Read the full summary

Action to recover damages, and also to obtain equitable relief, for the alleged wrongful removal of, and injury to, a fish-house and fishing paraphernalia owned by the plaintiffs within the Borough of Fenwick, brought to the Superior Court in Middlesex County where a demurrer to the second defense and to the defendants’ counterclaim was sustained (Burpee, J.) and the cause was afterward tried to the court, Reed, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendants upon all the issues except those raised by the fourth defense, and for the defendants to recover $107 on their amended…

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

The complaint alleges, as the basis of a recovery of damages and for injunctive relief, that the defendants on July 5th, 1913, removed and destroyed the plaintiffs’ fish-shed and personal property from their fishery, Gardner fish place, in the borough of Fenwick, which they owned by undivided interests and upon which they were maintaining this shed and personal property in the operation of their fishery and under and in pursuance of their right so to do, and by reason of these acts the plaintiffs have ever since July 5th, 1913, been prevented from operating their fish place.

The defenses…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Cicero Lumber Co. v. Town of CiceroIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State v. ConlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  5. Commonwealth v. MaletskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Phelps Dodge Copper Products Co. v. GroppoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. State v. VachonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  3. Vartelas v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  4. Dwyer v. FarrellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. Loglisci v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API