Legal Opinion

Griswold v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 19, 1954Published

1Opinion of the Court

140 Conn. 582 (1954)

WOODWARD H. GRISWOLD

v.

JOHN C. KELLY ET AL., LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Argued November 5, 1953.

Decided January 19, 1954.

INGLIS, C. J., BALDWIN, O'SULLIVAN, QUINLAN and WYNNE, JS.

Belton A. Copp, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Thomas J. Conroy, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was William L. Beers, attorney general, for the appellees (defendants).

WYNNE, J.

The facts in this case are set forth in the stipulation. The plaintiff is a man whose character and reputation are beyond reproach. He is a suitable person within the meaning of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loglisci v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  2. Beckanstin v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  3. Amarone v. BrennanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  4. Griswold v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API