Legal Opinion · Dissent

Griswold v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 19, 1954Published

1DissentBaldwin, J.

I disagree with that part of the opinion which holds that the commission did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant an exception in this case. The regulations give it that power, and it is in no position to question the legality of its own regulation. It is difficult to imagine a set of circumstances wherein a permittee could be more worthy of an exception in his favor than those present in this case. The effect of the commission’s action is either to close this plaintiff’s package store or to require him to work in it full time himself and employ a clerk to run his grocery store, or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Amarone v. BrennanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API